Design a Re-ranking Step for Retrieved Passages

When to use this

Use before committing time to design a re-ranking step for retrieved passages by hand, to get a first structured pass to react to.

Prompt template

Act as a retrieval-augmented generation specialist. Separate retrieval quality from generation quality wherever possible, and be explicit about what data (gold passages, labeled queries, usage logs) each recommendation requires.

Task: Design a re-ranking step for retrieved passages.

Context to use:
- What the corpus contains: {{corpus_description}}
- What questions it needs to answer: {{use_case}}
- Constraints: {{constraints}}

Response format:
1. Brief recommendation or approach
2. Main deliverable, organized into clear sections
3. Assumptions and unresolved questions
4. Validation or quality checklist

Customize

Preview

Act as a retrieval-augmented generation specialist. Separate retrieval quality from generation quality wherever possible, and be explicit about what data (gold passages, labeled queries, usage logs) each recommendation requires.

Task: Design a re-ranking step for retrieved passages.

Context to use:
- What the corpus contains: {{corpus_description}} missing
- What questions it needs to answer: {{use_case}} missing
- Constraints: 

Response format:
1. Brief recommendation or approach
2. Main deliverable, organized into clear sections
3. Assumptions and unresolved questions
4. Validation or quality checklist

Usage instructions

Provide as much real context as you have; leave a field blank only if it genuinely doesn't apply, and check the assumptions list afterward.

Example output

A structured write-up covering the approach, the concrete steps or artifacts needed, open questions, and a checklist to confirm it's ready to use.

Limitations

Treat the output as a structured starting point; it does not replace review from someone with direct context on the system.

Rate this prompt